Connect with us

Science

Karma in motion, scientific proofs of cause and effect in the real world

Published

on

Karma in Motion

Across cultures, people say “What goes around, comes around.” In spirituality, that’s Karma. In science, it’s cause and effect, Newton’s Third Law, or feedback loops. Both describe the same universal principle every action triggers a reaction, every cause creates a result, and nothing truly happens in isolation.

This section bridges spiritual philosophy with scientific reasoning, showing that Karma isn’t only mystical it’s measurable in behavior, physics, biology, and psychology.

1. Physics: Newton’s Third Law, The Physical Face of Karma

In physics, Newton’s Third Law states: “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.”
It’s the most direct scientific equivalent of Karma. If you push an object, it pushes back with equal force. Energy doesn’t vanish it transforms, redistributes, and returns.

Parallel to Karma:
Every action, whether physical or moral, sends out energy into the world. The universe maintains balance by returning that energy in some form. When a person spreads kindness, the “reaction” comes as goodwill and cooperation. When they spread harm, resistance and backlash follow. The laws of motion and morality mirror one another both preserve balance in their respective realms.

Real-world example:
Industrial pollution once fueled growth but led to environmental degradation. Now, global warming, rising sea levels, and natural disasters are the “reaction” to humanity’s unchecked “action.” This is Karma on a planetary scale.

2. Psychology: The Law of Cognitive and Behavioral Consequence

In psychology, Behavioral Conditioning and Cognitive Dissonance show how human minds naturally respond to actions with consequences.

  • When we act kindly, our brain releases serotonin and oxytocin, creating happiness and emotional stability.
  • When we act with deceit or harm, guilt and stress hormones like cortisol rise, leading to anxiety and burnout.

This means moral choices shape not just destiny but brain chemistry.
Dr. Martin Seligman’s research on Positive Psychology confirms that altruistic behavior improves mental health and life satisfaction scientific evidence that “good deeds return good outcomes.”

Example:
People who engage in community service or acts of empathy often report longer lifespans and higher emotional resilience. Conversely, those who engage in manipulation, corruption, or deceit experience higher rates of depression and insomnia due to cognitive dissonance.

3. Biology: The Feedback Mechanism in Nature

Nature itself operates on self-correcting systems. Every ecosystem maintains equilibrium through feedback loops.

  • When predator populations rise, prey declines, leading to predator starvation and eventual balance.
  • When humans exploit nature, ecological imbalance triggers disease, resource scarcity, and climate change nature’s version of karmic retribution.

Scientific interpretation:
Homeostasis in biology mirrors Karma in philosophy. It’s the built-in correction mechanism of the natural world. Every disturbance, whether physical or moral, finds equilibrium again.

4. Neuroscience: Mirror Neurons and Empathic Return

Neuroscientists discovered mirror neurons, brain cells that react not only when we perform an action but when we see others doing it. This means our brain literally mirrors emotional energy pain, joy, compassion around us.

Example:
When someone acts cruelly, they unconsciously absorb negative emotional states from their environment. The human brain is wired for empathy, so harming others often rebounds psychologically. This supports the idea that negative energy returns not through mystical force but through neural feedback.

5. Sociology: The Law of Social Reciprocity

Sociologists recognize reciprocity as a universal social rule. Communities that thrive operate on trust, fairness, and shared benefit. When individuals or institutions act selfishly, social trust collapses and isolation begins.

Example:
Corporate leaders who exploit workers or customers often face reputation collapse and consumer backlash. The downfall of major companies like Enron or the 2008 financial crash were not random, they were systemic reactions to greed and unethical behavior. Karma in this case worked through social systems.

6. Quantum Physics: The Observer Effect and Energy Exchange

In quantum science, the Observer Effect suggests that observation itself alters the state of what’s observed. Conscious intent influences energy behavior. While not “Karma” in the traditional sense, it aligns with the idea that thought and intention shape reality.

Modern insight:
Dr. Masaru Emoto’s experiments on water crystals showed that positive words and thoughts formed harmonious patterns, while negative ones caused chaotic structures. Though controversial, the idea symbolizes how consciousness affects the material world.

It echoes ancient wisdom: “As you think, so you become.”

7. Real-world Reflections of Scientific Karma

  • Environmental Karma: The rise in climate disasters reflects humanity’s exploitation of resources.
  • Technological Karma: The internet brought knowledge but also misinformation and addiction every innovation has its shadow.
  • Health Karma: Poor lifestyle choices smoking, stress, unhealthy diet return as physical disease. The body, like the universe, keeps score.

8. The Unified Principle: Science and Spirituality Converge

Whether in physics, biology, or ethics, the same truth emerges: actions generate reactions. Energy never disappears it circulates. Every system in nature, including the human mind, seeks balance.

What ancient sages called Karma, science calls causality. Both describe a universal principle the inevitability of consequence.

The Scientific Soul of Karma

Karma isn’t mythology it’s the architecture of reality. From subatomic particles to human society, everything runs on the law of return.

When we act with integrity, empathy, and awareness, we align with the natural flow of this universal law. When we act with greed, hatred, or harm, we disrupt it and that disruption circles back, as pain or loss, to restore equilibrium.

The lesson is timeless and scientific:
Nothing vanishes without trace. Everything comes full circle.

Or in both the language of science and spirit:

Every action leaves a footprint, and the universe always follows the trail.

Spread the love

Designer | Ideator | Thinker | Love Reading, Writing | Wildlife | Passionate about Learning New Stuff & Technologies. For suggestions and questions if you have any, then you can visit this link. (Disclaimer : My views are entirely my own and have nothing to do with any organisation)

Continue Reading
Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Editor's Picks

Antineoplaston can be used as an alternative treatment for cancer – part 2/2

Published

on

Antineoplaston can be used as an alternative treatment for cancer part 2

Read part 1 before continuing part 2

Antineoplastons are a group of naturally occurring peptides and amino acid derivatives that have been proposed as a treatment for cancer. The theory behind antineoplaston therapy is that these compounds can selectively target and kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed. 

Antineoplaston therapy was first developed by Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski in the 1970s. Dr. Burzynski discovered the compounds while studying peptides in blood and urine, and he began using them to treat cancer patients in the 1980s. Over the years, Dr. Burzynski and his team have conducted multiple clinical trials to test the safety and efficacy of antineoplaston therapy. 

The results of these trials have been mixed. Some patients have reported significant improvements in their cancer symptoms, while others have not seen any benefit. Additionally, some studies have suggested that antineoplaston therapy may have toxic side effects. The American Cancer Society (ACS) states that the safety and effectiveness of antineoplaston therapy have not been proven. The FDA has approved a limited number of clinical trials for antineoplastons for specific types of brain tumors, but larger and well-designed studies are still needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of antineoplaston therapy. 

It’s worth noting that Antineoplaston therapy is not widely accepted in the medical community, and the scientific evidence supporting its use as a cancer treatment is limited. The FDA has not approved antineoplaston therapy as a treatment for cancer, and it is not widely available in the United States. 

Antineoplaston therapy is an alternative cancer treatment that has been proposed as a treatment for cancer, but its safety and effectiveness have not been proven. There are still many questions about the long-term safety and efficacy of antineoplaston therapy, and more research is needed to determine whether it is a viable treatment option for cancer patients. Patients should consult with their healthcare providers before considering antineoplaston therapy as a cancer treatment. It’s important to remember that while alternative therapies may have some positive effects, they may not be as effective as standard cancer treatments and may have negative side effects. 

 12,141 total views,  2 views today

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Research

Antineoplaston can be used as an alternative treatment for cancer – part 1/2

Published

on

Antineoplaston can be used as an alternative treatment for cancer

Antineoplastons are a group of natural compounds that have been proposed as a treatment for cancer. The compounds were discovered by Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, a Polish-American physician, who began studying them in the 1970s. Dr. Burzynski claims that antineoplastons can selectively target and kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells intact. 

Antineoplastons are made from substances that are found naturally in the body, such as amino acids and peptides. They are administered orally or intravenously. According to Dr. Burzynski, antineoplastons work by restoring the balance of genetic regulation in cancer cells, which leads to cancer cell death. 

There have been several clinical trials of antineoplastons in patients with different types of cancer, including brain tumors, lung cancer, and breast cancer. Some of these trials have reported positive results, with patients showing improvement in their symptoms and tumor size reduction. However, many of the trials have been small and have not been conducted using rigorous scientific methods. 

The scientific community has been divided in their opinion on the effectiveness of antineoplastons as a cancer treatment. Some researchers have criticized the lack of rigorous scientific evidence supporting the use of antineoplastons, while others have pointed out the promising results seen in some of the trials. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved antineoplastons as a cancer treatment. The FDA has instead approved a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of antineoplastons in treating certain types of brain tumors. 

It’s worth mentioning that antineoplastons as a cancer treatment is considered as alternative or experimental therapy, and its use should be discussed with a doctor before making any decision. Also, it’s important to note that the FDA has not approved antineoplastons as a cancer treatment, and their safety and effectiveness have not been established. 

Antineoplastons are a group of natural compounds that have been proposed as a treatment for cancer. While there have been some reports of positive results in the treatment of cancer with antineoplastons, more rigorous scientific evidence is needed to establish their safety and effectiveness. It’s important to talk to a doctor before considering antineoplastons as a cancer treatment and to be aware that it is not approved by the FDA. 

Here is the link for part 2

 12,377 total views,  2 views today

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Health

Adulteration in food and health risk

Published

on

Adulteration in food and health risk

Adulteration in food refers to the practice of adding harmful substances to food in order to increase profits, which can also negatively impact human health. This can include adding water or other cheaper ingredients to food items, as well as using pesticides and other chemicals to preserve food. Adulteration in food can have serious health consequences, including cancer.

To reduce the risk of adulteration in food, it is important to increase oversight and regulations of the food industry. This can be done by increasing funding for food safety agencies and implementing stricter regulations on food labelling and testing. Consumers can also take steps to protect themselves by purchasing organic and locally-sourced foods, which are less likely to be adulterated.

Adulteration in food refers to the deliberate tampering or manipulation of food with substances that are harmful or not intended for human consumption. Adulteration of food can occur for various reasons, including to increase profits, to extend the shelf life of products, or to conceal substandard ingredients.

 

Here are some harmful effects of adulterated food:

  • Health Risks: Adulterated food can contain harmful substances, such as chemicals, toxic metals, or bacteria, that can cause serious health problems, such as food poisoning, organ damage, and long-term health problems.
  • Allergic Reactions: Some adulterants, such as food allergens, can cause serious allergic reactions in some individuals, leading to symptoms such as hives, itching, and breathing difficulties. In severe cases, anaphylaxis can occur, which can be life-threatening.
  • Nutritional Deficiencies: Adulterated food may contain lower levels of essential nutrients, such as vitamins and minerals, which can lead to nutritional deficiencies and long-term health problems.
  • Economic Costs: Adulterated food can result in costly recalls, lawsuits, and damage to brand reputation, which can have significant financial consequences for both food companies and consumers.
  • Trust in the Food System: Adulteration of food can erode consumer trust in the food system, leading to a loss of confidence in the safety and quality of the food supply.

It’s important for food companies and governments to take steps to prevent food adulteration, such as implementing strict food safety regulations and increasing food testing and enforcement, to ensure that the food supply is safe and of high quality. Consumers can also play a role by being vigilant and informed about the food they purchase and consume.

The food we eat today can negatively impact our health and well-being. Some of the most significant problems include: 

  • Processed Foods: Many of the foods that make up the modern diet, such as snacks, fast food, and packaged meals, are highly processed and contain high levels of added sugars, unhealthy fats, and salt. These foods are often low in fiber, vitamins, and minerals and can contribute to weight gain and chronic health problems, such as obesity, heart disease, and type 2 diabetes. 
  • Pesticides and Chemicals: Some foods are grown with the use of pesticides and other chemicals, which can be harmful to human health and the environment. These chemicals can remain in the food and enter our bodies, potentially causing health problems, such as endocrine disruption and cancer. 
  • Food Additives: Many processed foods contain food additives, such as artificial colours, flavours, and preservatives, which can have negative impacts on health, such as triggering allergies or exacerbating behaviour problems in children. 
  • Antibiotic Use in Livestock: The widespread use of antibiotics in livestock production can contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can be harmful to human health and reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics. 
  • Food Insecurity: For many people, access to healthy and affordable food is a challenge, particularly in low-income communities. This can lead to malnutrition and diet-related health problems, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. 

These are some of the major issues with the food we eat today. It’s important to be mindful of the foods we consume and make efforts to incorporate more whole, unprocessed foods into our diets. Furthermore, supporting policies and initiatives that promote sustainable and healthy food systems can help address these issues and improve the quality of the food we eat. 

 11,154 total views,  2 views today

Spread the love
Continue Reading

Trending