Editor's Picks
Reality is real or is there an external reality – part 2/2
Published
3 years agoon
Read part 1 before continuing part 2
Philosophers and scientists have debated whether reality is real or whether there is an external reality for centuries. It is generally assumed that an external reality exists apart from our perception of it. This implies that there is a world outside of our heads and that our heads do not create reality. When we look at a tree, for example, we perceive it as real and existing independently of our perception of it. Even if we close our eyes or turn away, the tree remains. Physical laws and the natural world, similarly, exist independently of our comprehension or belief in them.
When we look at a tree, we are aware that it is a tangible reality that we can touch and feel, but our perception of the tree is also influenced by our emotional reactions to it, cultural connotations with it, and recollections of previous trees. Similarly, when we hear a sound, we recognise that it comes from a physical source, but our perception of the sound may be impacted by past preconceptions, worries, or prejudices. There are implications for philosophy, science, and everyday life when determining if reality is real or if there is an external reality.
Regardless of our differing perspectives, it is apparent that our vision of reality is a consequence of our unique experiences, cognitive biases, and cultural upbringings, rather than a mirror of the outside world. Reality exists independent of how we see it, according to the metaphysical realist viewpoint. In contrast to our own experiences, cognitive biases, and cultural backgrounds, it asserts that there is just one, objective reality. To put it another way, truth is reality regardless of how we see it.
Idealism, on the other hand, believes that reality has a mental or spiritual underpinning. It asserts that our awareness or mind is ultimately responsible for the outward cosmos. Reality is subjective from an idealistic perspective. In actuality, a variety of things impact our experiences, including cognitive biases and cultural origins. To make sense of the world around us, our brains filter sensory input, which might result in perceptual variances. Optical illusions, for example, are instances of how our brains may be deceived into experiencing something that is not truly there.
Our perspective of reality can be influenced by our cultural backgrounds and personal experiences. A person who grew up in a society where ghosts and supernatural creatures are thought to exist, for example, maybe more prone to interpret particular encounters as proof of the supernatural. The philosophical debate over whether reality is true and if there is an external reality is intricate and ongoing. Although metaphysical realism believes in an objective reality apart from our individual experiences, idealism argues that reality is mostly determined by how we see it. In reality, a multitude of factors, such as cognitive biases and cultural backgrounds, influences human perceptions, resulting in perceptual differences.
1,163 total views, 10 views today
Designer | Ideator | Thinker | Love Reading, Writing | Wildlife | Passionate about Learning New Stuff & Technologies. For suggestions and questions if you have any, then you can visit this link. (Disclaimer : My views are entirely my own and have nothing to do with any organisation)
You may like
Editor's Picks
The truth about “33 crore Gods”, understanding the 33 Divine energies of Hinduism
Published
1 month agoon
November 1, 2025
For centuries, a widespread belief has circulated that Hinduism worships 33 crore (330 million) gods. This number is often cited by critics and even misunderstood by followers. But the truth lies much deeper and far more profound.
In the Vedas, the original sacred texts of Hinduism, the term used is “Trayastrimsati Koti Deva”, which translates to “33 Devas (divine entities)” not 33 crores. The Sanskrit word “Koti” can mean either type or category, and later mistranslations led to the confusion of 33 categories being interpreted as 33 crores.
Let’s explore who these 33 Devas are, what they represent, and what this ancient number actually means.
1. The Origin of the 33 Devas, Vedic References
The Yajur Veda (32.1), Atharva Veda (10.7.13), and Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (3.9.1) mention the 33 Devas, representing the cosmic principles of the universe rather than individual gods with separate personalities.
According to the Shatapatha Brahmana (14.5.2.6), the 33 Devas are divided as follows:
- 12 Adityas (Solar Deities)
- 11 Rudras (Deities of Transformation)
- 8 Vasus (Elemental Deities)
- 2 Ashvins (Divine Twin Physicians)
Total = 12 + 11 + 8 + 2 = 33 Devas
These 33 represent not physical beings but energies, functions, and cosmic laws operating in creation, preservation, and transformation.
2. The 8 Vasus, Guardians of Material Existence
The Vasus symbolize the basic elements and energies of nature. They are responsible for the physical foundation of the cosmos and human life.
| Vasu | Representation | Meaning / Domain |
|---|---|---|
| Agni | Fire | Energy, transformation, vitality |
| Prithvi | Earth | Stability, nourishment |
| Vayu | Air | Life-force, breath, movement |
| Antariksha | Atmosphere | Space between heaven and earth |
| Aditya | Sun | Illumination, life, consciousness |
| Dyaus | Sky | Vastness, divine space |
| Soma | Moon | Mind, emotion, rhythm |
| Nakshatra | Stars | Cosmic order, destiny |
Example:
When you light a lamp during a ritual, you invoke Agni not as a god in human form, but as the principle of transformation, the bridge between the physical and spiritual realms.
3. The 11 Rudras, The Energies of Transformation
The Rudras are forces of change, destruction, and renewal. They represent the emotional and spiritual dimensions of human life. In later Hinduism, the concept of Rudra evolved into Lord Shiva, the ultimate transformer.
The 11 Rudras represent the 10 vital energies (pranas) in the body and the mind (manas), the 11th.
These govern our breath, emotion, and spiritual awakening.
Rudras’ symbolic role: They remind us that destruction is not always evil. It is part of the cycle of regeneration, just as a forest fire clears the way for new growth.
Example:
When old beliefs or attachments are destroyed in your life, it is the Rudra principle working through you painful, yet necessary for evolution.
4. The 12 Adityas, The Solar Principles of Time and Dharma
The Adityas are not just sun gods, but the forces that sustain life and order. They represent the months of the year and uphold universal law and morality.
| Aditya | Symbolism | Domain / Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Mitra | Friendship | Harmony and truth |
| Varuna | Waters | Cosmic order, moral integrity |
| Aryaman | Nobility | Social duty and ethics |
| Bhaga | Fortune | Prosperity and sharing |
| Amsa | Share | Justice and equality |
| Daksha | Skill | Discipline and capability |
| Surya | Sun | Light and perception |
| Savitri | Life-force | Creation and inspiration |
| Pusha | Nourisher | Growth and sustenance |
| Vivasvan | Radiance | Enlightenment |
| Tvashta | Craftsman | Creativity, innovation |
| Vishnu | All-pervading | Preservation, protection |
Example:
When you show compassion, fairness, or creativity, you express the qualities of the Adityas, the sustaining lights within your own consciousness.
5. The 2 Ashvins, Twin Gods of Healing and Harmony
The Ashvins, or Nasatya and Dasra, are twin horsemen representing health, medicine, and rejuvenation. They symbolize the balance between body and mind, day and night, reason and emotion.
In the Rig Veda, they are called the “physicians of the gods,” bringing both physical healing and spiritual restoration.
Example:
Every act of empathy or caregiving reflects the Ashvinic energy, the power to heal through compassion.
6. The Philosophical Meaning Behind the 33 Devas
The 33 Devas are not separate entities to be worshipped individually, but universal principles operating through nature, time, and consciousness.
In modern terms:
- Vasus = Matter and Energy
- Rudras = Psychological and Spiritual Forces
- Adityas = Moral and Cosmic Order
- Ashvins = Restoration and Healing
Together, they represent the complete ecosystem of creation physical, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual.
7. How the Misinterpretation Happened
The confusion came from the Sanskrit word “Koti”, which means both “type” and “crore.”
Ancient texts mentioned Trayastrimsati Koti Deva, meaning 33 categories of deities.
Later translations took “Koti” as “crore,” leading to the myth that Hinduism believes in 33 crore gods.
But even within Hinduism, the deeper realization is expressed beautifully in the Rig Veda (1.164.46):
“Ekam Sat Vipra Bahudha Vadanti”
(Truth is One, the wise call it by many names.)
This means that all these divine forces are expressions of one Supreme Reality Brahman, the infinite consciousness.
8. The Modern Relevance of the 33 Devas
In today’s world, the concept of 33 Devas can be seen as symbolic of the different dimensions of human potential.
- The Vasus teach us to respect nature and balance with the environment.
- The Rudras remind us that transformation is necessary for growth.
- The Adityas guide us toward ethical living and social harmony.
- The Ashvins inspire us to heal ourselves and others.
Instead of external deities, we can view them as inner archetypes, energies to awaken within ourselves.
Example:
When you meditate, you invoke the Aditya of light;
when you forgive, you embody the Rudra of transformation;
when you care for nature, you honor the Vasus.
9. The Ultimate Truth, From Many to One
Hinduism’s beauty lies in its inclusiveness.
It begins with multiplicity but ends with unity.
The 33 Devas are not 33 separate gods but 33 facets of one divine consciousness, much like light splitting into colors through a prism.
As from the Upanishads:
“Sarvam Khalvidam Brahma”
(All this is indeed Brahman, the Divine Reality.)
The journey of understanding these 33 Devas is, therefore, not about memorizing names, but realizing that every element of existence is sacred, within and around us.
From Confusion to Clarity
The idea of “33 crore gods” is a beautiful example of how language, over time, can distort spiritual truth. The Vedic 33 Devas represent a cosmic system of harmony, where every force, from fire to compassion, plays a divine role in maintaining balance.
Understanding them helps us see the world not as fragmented, but as one interconnected web of divine energy, a timeless truth that science is only now rediscovering.
In the words of the Bhagavad Gita (7.8):
“I am the taste in water, the light in the sun and the moon, the sacred syllable Om in all the Vedas.”
The divine is not in 33 crores of forms, but in every atom, every heartbeat, and every act of awareness.
Editor's Picks
Mahabharata, a timeless mirror of human psychology, morality, and what its characters teach us about life
Published
1 month agoon
November 1, 2025
The Mahabharata is not just a mythological epic, it is a mirror of human psychology, morality, and the choices that define society. Every character represents a unique facet of human nature from wisdom and ego to deceit and sacrifice. Through their triumphs and tragedies, the Mahabharata teaches us timeless lessons about ethics, leadership, greed, compassion, and the duality of good and evil that lives within every human being.
The Mahabharata, one of the greatest epics ever written, is not merely a story of war. It is a mirror reflecting the human condition love, ego, righteousness, jealousy, ambition, and redemption. Every character in the Mahabharata represents a unique psychological archetype that still lives within us today. By studying them, we can learn how intellect, emotion, morality, and dharma interact in the real world.
This article explores major characters from the Mahabharata and decodes what they symbolize, how their choices parallel modern human behavior, and what lessons we can draw from them in today’s world.
1. Shakuni — Intelligence Without Morality Leads to Destruction
Who he was & character insight:
Shakuni, the prince of Gandhara, also the maternal uncle of the Kauravas, was an intellectual genius was among the most intelligent and cunning strategists in the Mahabharata. However, his intellect was poisoned by vengeance and ego. His sharp mind, strategic thinking, and mastery of manipulation could have been used for great good, but he used his knowledge of human psychology and manipulation for revenge and deceit.
Lesson:
Intellect without ethics becomes a weapon of destruction. In today’s world, Shakuni represents people who use intelligence to exploit systems, spread misinformation, or manipulate others for personal gain whether in politics, corporate strategy, or personal relationships. Intelligence without empathy leads to chaos. Shakuni’s brilliance, corrupted by resentment, became a weapon that destroyed entire generations.
Real-world parallel:
Think of corporate scandals like Enron or Theranos, where intelligence and innovation were used unethically. Shakuni teaches us that wisdom without virtue is chaos disguised as brilliance. We see “Shakuni minds” in modern contexts powerful political strategists, media manipulators, or corporate schemers who twist truth for personal gain.
Scientific insight:
Research in cognitive psychology shows that high intelligence, when coupled with Machiavellian traits (manipulativeness, cynicism), leads to unethical behavior if unchecked by moral values.
Reference:
- Christie & Geis (1970), Studies in Machiavellianism, Academic Press.
2. Duryodhana — Ego and Entitlement Blind You to Truth. The Face of Ego and Insecurity
Who he was:
Duryodhana was brave, generous, and confident, but his pride and sense of entitlement destroyed him. He believed he was the rightful heir to the throne and refused to see his own flaws. Duryodhana was not evil by nature, he was insecure and jealous of the Pandavas’ virtues. His ego made him interpret fairness as favoritism.
Lesson:
Ego blinds people to reality. Duryodhana’s inability to accept his mistakes and his constant need to prove superiority mirrors how many leaders or individuals lose everything because they prioritize ego over reason. Insecurity, if unaddressed, grows into arrogance.
Real-world parallel & character insight:
In business or politics, those who cannot take criticism often alienate their teams or supporters. Leaders who surround themselves with “yes-men” end up isolated, much like Duryodhana surrounded himself with Shakuni’s deceit rather than wisdom. Many modern leaders fail not because they lack vision, but because they fear others’ success.
Psychological insight:
Research in behavioral psychology connects narcissism and envy with destructive leadership.
Reference:
- Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2011), The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Wiley.
3. Yudhishthira — Righteousness Without Balance Can Become Weakness
Who he was & character insight:
Yudhishthira, the eldest Pandava, was known for his honesty and commitment to dharma. Yet his obsession with truth and morality sometimes clouded his practical judgment, leading to great losses, such as when he gambled away his kingdom and family.
Lesson:
Being good does not mean being naive. When morality becomes rigidity, it can be manipulated. Righteousness must be balanced with wisdom and courage.
Real-world parallel:
In today’s workplaces or politics, ethical leaders sometimes hesitate to act decisively, fearing moral compromise, allowing corruption or injustice to flourish. Yudhishthira’s story reminds us that goodness needs strength to survive in a world of deception.
4. Karna — Loyalty and Ego Can Chain a Noble Soul. The Tragic Hero of Loyalty and Injustice
Who he was & character insight:
Karna was one of the most tragic figures noble, generous, and a great warrior. Yet his loyalty to Duryodhana and his ego about his birth status trapped him in moral conflict. Born a warrior but denied his identity, Karna’s life was defined by rejection and his desperate need for validation. His loyalty to Duryodhana, who accepted him when others didn’t, blinded him to dharma.
Lesson:
Blind loyalty, even to a friend, can lead to downfall. Karna teaches us that when loyalty becomes servitude, we betray our own values. His life also shows the pain of social exclusion how rejection and constant judgment can push even good people toward bitterness. When emotional wounds drive loyalty, rational judgment fades.
Real-world parallel:
In real life, Karna is every person who feels undervalued despite talent the overlooked employee, the discriminated individual, the self-made struggler. His story teaches compassion for those marginalized by society’s prejudices. Karna represents individuals who side with wrong systems out of gratitude or trauma. Emotional debt can compromise ethics.
Reference:
- Psychology of gratitude and loyalty: McCullough, M.E. et al. (2001), Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 295–318.
5. Arjuna — The Dilemma of Duty and Conscience. The Conflicted Warrior and Seeker of Truth
Who he was & character insight:
Arjuna, the greatest warrior of his time, symbolizes human confusion when duty and morality collide. On the battlefield of Kurukshetra, he hesitated to fight his own relatives and experienced a moral breakdown that led to one of the greatest philosophical teachings, The Bhagavad Gita. Arjuna represents every human being torn between action and conscience.
Lesson:
Arjuna represents the modern individual facing moral dilemmas torn between professional obligations and personal values. The Gita’s message to Arjuna, “Do your duty without attachment to results,” remains a cornerstone of ethical action even today. True wisdom lies in balance between heart and duty, thought and action.
Real-world parallel:
Professionals who must make hard ethical decisions journalists reporting truth despite pressure, judges ruling against power, or whistleblowers revealing corporate crimes all face an Arjuna-like crisis of conscience. Also soldiers, or leaders often face “Arjuna moments” moral crises that test their inner values.
Philosophical note:
Krishna’s guidance reflects cognitive reframing changing how one perceives duty, purpose, and outcome.
Reference:
- Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 2 (Sankhya Yoga).
- Viktor Frankl (1946), Man’s Search for Meaning.
6. Draupadi — Courage and Dignity Amid Injustice
Who she was & character insight:
Draupadi was powerful, intelligent, and outspoken, yet she suffered immense humiliation when Yudhishthira gambled her away. Still, she stood tall, demanding justice, symbolizing feminine strength and resilience. Draupadi endured humiliation yet stood tall as the moral compass of the epic. Her questions in the royal court “Whom did you lose first, yourself or me?” challenged patriarchal norms.
Lesson:
Draupadi embodies the fight for dignity and equality. She teaches that one must never remain silent in the face of injustice, even when the whole world stands against you. Questioning injustice, even in silence, is the beginning of social change.
Real-world parallel:
Draupadi’s story echoes in every woman who stands up against harassment, discrimination, or abuse or social reforms. Her spirit teaches courage, voice, and unyielding self-respect. Draupadi’s resilience mirrors that of women who challenge systemic oppression in society and politics today.
Reference:
Nussbaum, M. (2001), Women and Human Development, Cambridge University Press.
7. Bhishma — The Burden of Oaths and Misplaced Duty
Who he was & character insight:
Bhishma was the epitome of discipline and sacrifice, taking a lifelong vow of celibacy and loyalty to the throne of Hastinapur. Yet his blind adherence to duty made him a witness to injustice without intervention. His sense of dharma was so rigid that he supported a corrupt throne even when his heart disagreed.
Lesson:
When principles are followed without questioning context, they can cause harm. Duty should never override conscience. Excessive attachment to duty without ethical reflection can cause moral paralysis.
Real-world parallel:
In modern governance or institutions, Bhishma represents bureaucrats or officials who see wrongdoing but stay silent in the name of protocol or loyalty. His life warns against moral paralysis in the face of injustice. Employees or officials who remain loyal to an unethical system “because it’s their duty” often perpetuate injustice much like Bhishma.
Psychological view:
This reflects cognitive dissonance, the inner conflict between belief and action. Bhishma chose peace of mind through obedience, not conscience.
Reference:
Festinger, L. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press.
8. Drona — Knowledge Entangled in Ambition
Who he was & character insight:
Drona was a teacher of unmatched skill but driven by ambition and pride. He used his knowledge as leverage for power, ultimately aligning with the Kauravas despite knowing the truth.
Lesson:
When teachers or mentors lose moral compass and chase recognition or influence, they betray the very purpose of wisdom. Knowledge must serve humanity, not ego.
Real-world parallel:
In academia, business, or technology, misuse of knowledge for manipulation, profit, or fame such as unethical scientific experiments or AI misuse reflects Drona’s fall. His story reminds us that the true guru empowers others selflessly.
9. Krishna — The Divine Strategist and Guide of Conscious Action
Who he was & character insight:
Lord Krishna was not just a divine figure, but a symbol of wisdom, strategy, and balance. He taught that life is about righteous action (karma) with awareness and detachment from results. Krishna embodies Karma Yoga detached action guided by wisdom. He does not fight the war, he guides Arjuna to act righteously.
Lesson:
Krishna represents the higher consciousness that guides every human through chaos. His teachings in the Bhagavad Gita form the foundation of self-mastery, mindfulness, and leadership. True leadership is about awakening awareness, not controlling outcomes.
Real-world parallel:
In leadership and psychology, Krishna’s counsel mirrors modern cognitive-behavioral wisdom focus on what you can control (actions) rather than what you cannot (outcomes). Mindfulness-based therapy today echoes the same truth Krishna taught Arjuna on the battlefield. Modern mentors, coaches, and visionary leaders who empower others rather than dominate them are the Krishnas of today.
Reference:
Covey, S. R. (1989), The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People.
Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 3 (Karma Yoga).
10. Gandhari — The Danger of Complicity in Evil
Who she was & character insight:
Gandhari, though righteous, chose to blindfold herself out of loyalty to her husband Dhritarashtra, symbolizing deliberate ignorance. Her silence during her sons’ wrongdoings became complicity.
Lesson:
Turning a blind eye to injustice makes one part of it. Silence in the face of evil is not neutrality it is participation.
Real-world parallel:
In society, when people ignore corruption, domestic violence, or discrimination because “it’s not my problem,” they become modern Gandharis. Awareness must be coupled with courage to act.
11. Dhritarashtra — Leadership Paralyzed by Attachment
Who he was & character insight:
The blind king loved his son Duryodhana excessively and could never discipline him, even when he knew he was wrong.
Lesson:
Attachment blinds judgment. Leaders who cannot rise above personal bias destroy institutions. Dhritarashtra teaches that love without accountability leads to ruin.
Real-world parallel:
This is seen in nepotism, where leaders promote loyalty over merit from family-run corporations to political dynasties causing decay within systems.
12. Kunti — Strength in Sacrifice and the Power of Acceptance
Who she was & character insight:
Kunti endured immense suffering but stayed emotionally resilient. She symbolizes motherhood, endurance, and the silent strength to accept destiny with grace.
Lesson:
Acceptance is not weakness. It is inner strength that transforms pain into purpose.
Real-world parallel:
In today’s fast-paced, uncertain world, Kunti’s composure reflects emotional intelligence facing loss, change, or challenge with faith and balance.
13. Ekalavya — The Price of Passion and the Injustice of Caste
Who he was & character insight:
Ekalavya, a tribal archer, showed unparalleled dedication to Drona, even without formal recognition. Yet, he was denied equal opportunity due to social hierarchy.
Lesson:
True talent often comes from marginalized corners of society. The world still denies opportunities to the underprivileged, even when they possess excellence.
Real-world parallel:
Ekalavya represents the self-taught innovators and learners of today who thrive despite lack of privilege or institutional support. His story inspires perseverance against systemic inequality.
14. Bhima — The Embodiment of Strength and Justice
Who he was & character insight:
Bhima, the second Pandava, symbolized raw strength and emotional intensity. Though fierce in battle, he was guided by deep moral conviction and a sense of justice, especially when defending the weak.
Lesson:
Power guided by purpose leads to justice, while power guided by anger leads to destruction.
Real-world parallel:
Bhima reflects those who channel their aggression toward social reform activists, whistleblowers, and defenders of the oppressed.
Scientific connection:
Modern psychology recognizes “assertive aggression” as healthy when it aims to protect fairness rather than harm.
Reference:
- Berkowitz, L. (1993), Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control, McGraw-Hill.
15. Sanjaya — The Symbol of Awareness and Clarity
Who he was & character insight:
Sanjaya, the narrator gifted with divine vision (divya drishti), represents mindfulness and clarity amid chaos. He observes without bias and speaks only truth.
Lesson:
Awareness is power. The ability to witness events objectively leads to wisdom.
Real-world parallel:
Journalists, psychologists, and data analysts embody Sanjaya’s spirit when they report truthfully, detached from bias or personal agenda.
Reference:
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003), Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context, Clinical Psychology.
The Mahabharata as a Mirror of the Modern World
The Mahabharata is not just a story of war, it is a study of the human condition. Each character embodies a universal lesson, intellect must serve ethics, power must be guided by wisdom, and emotion must be balanced by reason.
In the real world, these lessons translate to moral leadership, emotional intelligence, self-awareness, and compassion in personal and professional life.
Ultimately, the Mahabharata teaches us that good and evil exist within us all. It is our choices, not our abilities, that define our dharma the path of righteousness.
Psychologically, the Mahabharata is an internal war between our impulses (Duryodhana), wisdom (Krishna), emotion (Bhima), ego (Karna), and conscience (Arjuna). Every human being is a battlefield Kurukshetra where these forces clash daily.
The Mahabharata teaches us that dharma is not fixed, it is situational, flexible, and rooted in conscience. The epic urges us to examine our motives, balance intellect with empathy, and act with awareness.
In the modern world, filled with moral complexity, the wisdom of Mahabharata helps us decode human nature, leadership, loyalty, and ethics reminding us that the war is not outside, but within.
References
- Radhakrishnan, S. (1948). The Bhagavad Gita. HarperCollins.
- Ganguli, K.M. (1883–1896). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. Public Domain Text.
- Chaturvedi, B.K. (2004). Mahabharata: The Greatest Spiritual Epic of All Time. Diamond Books.
- Chakravarthi, P. (2015). Ethical Dilemmas in the Mahabharata. Oxford University Press.
- Satchidananda, S. (1988). The Living Gita: The Complete Bhagavad Gita. Integral Yoga Publications.
- Sen, A. (2017). The Argumentative Indian. Penguin Books — contextual discussion of ethics and duty in Indian philosophy.
- Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
- Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control. McGraw-Hill.
- McCullough, M. E., et al. (2001). Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 295–318.
- Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2011). The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Wiley.
- Nussbaum, M. (2001). Women and Human Development. Cambridge University Press.
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context. Clinical Psychology.
- Bhagavad Gita, translated by Eknath Easwaran (2007).
- Frankl, V. (1946). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.
- Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Simon & Schuster.
AI
The rise of agentic AI, what it means today, and how it’s already changing work and research
Published
1 month agoon
November 1, 2025By
Dam Rajdeep
Agentic AI marks a step beyond chatbots and single-turn generative models, it signifies systems that can plan, act, and coordinate over multiple steps with limited human supervision. Instead of only replying to prompts, agentic AI systems set subgoals, call tools, and execute actions across services and data sources, often with persistent memory and feedback loops.
What is agentic AI, in plain terms
Agentic AI is a class of systems that, given a high-level goal, can autonomously plan a sequence of steps, call external tools or APIs, monitor outcomes, and adapt their plan as needed. They typically combine large language models for reasoning and language, with tool integrations, memory stores, and orchestration layers that coordinate multiple specialized agents. Agentic systems are goal-oriented, proactive, and designed to act in the world, not just generate text. IBM+1
Why the distinction matters, briefly:
- Traditional LLMs respond to prompts, they are reactive.
- Agentic AI makes decisions, executes actions, and keeps state across tasks, it is proactive. IBM+1
A short timeline, and the latest corporate moves
- 2023 to 2024, the LLM era matured, prompting experiments in tool use and multi-step workflows, for example chains of thought, RAG (retrieval augmented generation), and tool calling.
- 2024 to 2025, vendors and research groups shifted toward multi-agent orchestration, and cloud providers launched blueprints and product groups focused on agentic systems. NVIDIA published agentic AI blueprints to accelerate enterprise adoption, AWS formed a new internal group dedicated to agentic AI, and IBM, Microsoft, and others framed agentic approaches within enterprise offerings and research. NVIDIA Blog+2NVIDIA Blog+2
- Analysts warn of “agent washing,” and Gartner projected many early projects may be scrapped unless value is proven, making governance and realistic pilots essential. Reuters
Key recent coverage and milestones:
- NVIDIA launched Blueprints and developer tool guidance to speed agentic app building, including vision and retrieval components, and announced new models for agent safety and orchestration. NVIDIA Blog+1
- Reuters and TechCrunch reported AWS reorganizations and a new group to accelerate agentic AI development inside AWS, a sign cloud vendors view agentic AI as a strategic next step. Reuters+1
How agentic AI systems are built, at a high level
A typical agentic architecture contains several building blocks, each deserving attention when you design or evaluate a system:
- Input and goal interface, this is where users specify high-level goals, often in natural language.
- Planner, this component decomposes the goal into sub-tasks, sequences, or a workflow. Planners can be LLM-based, symbolic, or hybrid.
- Specialized agents, these are modules that execute sub-tasks, for example a web retrieval agent, a code-writing agent, a database query agent, a scheduling agent, or a vision analysis agent.
- Tool integration layer, this exposes APIs, databases, or external systems the agents can call.
- Memory and state, persistent stores that let agents recall previous steps, user preferences, or long-term context.
- Orchestrator or conductor, a coordinator that assigns subtasks, collects results, and resolves conflicts among agents.
- Monitoring, safety, and human-in-the-loop gates, these provide audit trails, approvals for critical actions, and guardrails to prevent harmful or irreversible actions. arXiv+1
Two development paradigms are emerging, with ongoing research and debate:
- Pipeline-based agentic systems, where planning, tool use, and memory are orchestrated externally by a controller, for example an LLM planner that calls retrieval and action agents.
- Model-native agentic systems, where planning, tool use, and memory are internalized within a single model or tightly integrated model family, trained or fine-tuned to execute multi-step workflows directly. Recent surveys describe this model-native shift as a key research frontier. arXiv+1
Real examples, current uses and early production scenarios
Agentic AI is being trialed and deployed across domains, here are concrete examples and patterns, with sources.
- Enterprise automation and R&D, examples:
- AWS aims to use agentic AI for automation, internal productivity tools, and enhancements to voice assistants like Alexa, by forming a dedicated group to accelerate agentic capabilities. Enterprises use agentic prototypes to compile research, draft reports, or orchestrate multi-step cloud operations. Reuters+1
- Video and vision workflows:
- NVIDIA’s Blueprints and NIM provide templates to build agents that analyze video, extract insights, summarize streams, and trigger workflows for monitoring, inspection, or media production. These examples show how agentic systems combine vision models with planners and tool calls. NVIDIA Blog+1
- Customer service and personal productivity:
- Microsoft and other vendors showcased agentic assistants that can navigate enterprise systems, handle returns, or perform invoice reviews by chaining a sequence of tasks across services, often prompting human approval for final steps. See reporting from Ignite 2024 and subsequent vendor updates. AP News
- Research assistance:
- Agentic systems can be used to survey literature, generate hypotheses, design experiments, run simulations, gather data, and draft reports or slide decks. Research labs are experimenting with agentic orchestration to speed hypothesis generation and reproducible pipelines. This is an active area of industry and academic collaboration. AI Magazine+1
- Code generation and developer assistance:
- Agentic coding assistants coordinate test generation, run tests, fix failures, and deploy artifacts, moving beyond single-line suggestions to feature-level automation. Some vendor tools and research prototypes demonstrate agents that claim features, implement them, test and iterate. This is exactly the “vibe coding” pattern many teams now use, combined with agentic orchestration. arXiv
What research is focusing on now, and why it matters
Research in 2024 to 2025 has concentrated on several areas critical for agentic AI to be useful and safe:
- Model-native integration, where models learn planning, tool use, and memory as part of their parameters. This promises simpler deployment and faster adaptation, but it raises challenges in safety, interpretability, and retraining costs. Surveys and papers describe this as a major paradigm shift. arXiv+1
- Multi-agent coordination and communication protocols, researchers study how multiple specialized agents should share tasks and avoid conflicting actions, drawing on multi-agent systems literature in AI and robotics. arXiv
- Safety, auditability, and explainability, this research asks how to keep humans in control, generate transparent logs of decisions, and provide retraceable reasons for agent actions. Legal scholars and technologists are proposing frameworks for liability, human oversight, and “stop” mechanisms. arXiv+1
- Benchmarks and evaluation, new benchmarks evaluate agentic systems on goal completion, long-horizon planning, tool use correctness, and resilience to adversarial inputs. These are different metrics than conventional NLP tasks. Several preprints and arXiv surveys outline these needs. arXiv+1
- Guardrails, alignment and retrieval safety, including research into guardrail models, retrieval accuracy, and provenance, to avoid “garbage-in, agentic-out” failures when an agent acts on poor or manipulated data. Industry blogs and warnings emphasize data quality as a make-or-break factor. NVIDIA Developer+1
Benefits, realistic promise, and where value is tangible
Agentic AI can deliver clear business and societal value when applied to the right problems:
- Automating repetitive knowledge work that spans multiple systems, for example multi-step reporting, compliance checks, or routine IT operations, yields time savings and fewer human errors. Reuters
- Augmenting expert workflows, for example letting clinicians or engineers offload routine synthesis, literature review, or data collation, so experts focus on judgment and decisions. NVIDIA Blog
- Speeding prototyping and cross-disciplinary research, because agents can orchestrate many tasks in parallel, from data retrieval to initial analysis and draft generation. AI Magazine
However, the ROI is not automatic, and vendors and analysts stress careful pilots and measurement. Gartner warned that many early agentic projects suffer from unclear value propositions, unrealistic expectations, or immature tooling, leading to potential cancelation. That makes disciplined experiments, KPIs, and governance essential. Reuters
Major risks and governance, a checklist for practitioners
Agentic systems can amplify both benefits and harms, here are practical governance measures to reduce risk:
- Define narrow, measurable goals for pilots, avoid broad open-ended autonomy at first.
- Always include human approval for irreversible or high-risk actions, for example financial transactions, legal filings, or medical decisions.
- Log every action, tool call, and data source with timestamps and provenance, so auditors can reconstruct decisions later.
- Use sandboxed environments for testing, and restrict access to critical systems unless explicit human sign-off is present.
- Regularly audit training and retrieval data for quality and bias, because poor data produces poor actions.
- Establish a clear ownership and liability model in contracts and policies, clarifying who is accountable when an agent acts.
- Invest in continuous monitoring, anomaly detection, and the ability to immediately halt agent activity. IBM+1
Concrete steps to experiment with agentic AI, for teams and researchers
If you want to pilot agentic AI, a pragmatic roadmap looks like this:
- Identify a bounded workflow with repetitive, measurable steps, for example quarterly compliance report generation, or incident triage.
- Build a small orchestration prototype that uses an LLM to plan sub-tasks, and simple agents to call retrieval, spreadsheets, or internal APIs. Keep the agent sandboxed.
- Maintain human-in-the-loop checkpoints for each high-stakes action. Measure success rates, time saved, and error incidence.
- Iterate on prompts, memory strategy, and tool connectors, add logging and provenance from day one.
- If successful, expand scope carefully, add safety policies, and formalize SLA and audit processes. NVIDIA Blog+1
Where researchers and industry are headed next
Expect continued emphasis on:
- Model-native agentic approaches that internalize planning and tool use, potentially improving latency and coherence, while creating new safety challenges. arXiv
- Benchmarks that measure long-horizon goal achievement, tool usage correctness, and resilience under real-world noise. arXiv
- Enterprise toolkits and blueprints, from vendors like NVIDIA and cloud providers, to accelerate safe deployments. NVIDIA Blog+1
- Regulatory and legal attention, focusing on audit logs, human oversight, and liability assignments for autonomous actions. arXiv
Agentic AI is already moving from research demos into enterprise pilots, and cloud vendors are investing heavily, because the promise is real, the potential gains are large, and many workflows remain ripe for automation. Yet the technology is early, with important unsolved problems in safety, governance, and evaluation. The right approach for teams is cautious experimentation, strong human oversight, and investment in logging and audit trails, so we can harvest the productivity benefits of agentic AI while avoiding costly failures.
Readings and references, for further deep dives
- IBM, What is Agentic AI, overview and business framing. IBM+1
- NVIDIA, What Is Agentic AI, and Agentic AI Blueprints, developer guidance and blueprints. NVIDIA Blog+1
- Reuters coverage, AWS forms a new group focused on agentic AI, March 2025, corporate reorg reported. Reuters
- ArXiv surveys, Beyond Pipelines: Model-Native Agentic AI, and Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures and Applications, for technical and research perspectives. arXiv+1
- Gartner and Reuters coverage of risks and vendor maturity, analysis on agent washing and project attrition predictions. Reuters
- Industry blogs and tool pages, including NVIDIA developer posts on new Nemotron models and agent toolkits, AWS and IBM explainers, for hands-on toolkits and examples. NVIDIA Developer+1
When honesty, simplicity, blind trust leave you vulnerable. Why good people get betrayed the most and how to heal
From 5,126 failures to a billion-dollar revolution, the inspiring story of James Dyson
Karma in motion, scientific proofs of cause and effect in the real world
Trending
-
UI/UX7 years agoHuman Cognition Processes And Types
-
Editor's Picks7 years agoThe Ontology of Designing Self
-
Design9 years agoJakob Nielsen’s (Usability Heuristics): 10 Heuristic Principles With Examples
-
Design9 years agoDon Norman’s Principles of Design With Examples
-
Editor's Picks8 years agoLost in the Woods
-
Editor's Picks3 years agoBreaking down the barriers of ignorance
-
Editor's Picks3 years agoSpirituality, Atheism the juxtaposition of finding meaning to purposeful life – part 2/2
-
Editor's Picks3 years agoConsciousness and enlightenment entail broader perspective as a whole