Across cultures, people say “What goes around, comes around.” In spirituality, that’s Karma. In science, it’s cause and effect, Newton’s Third Law, or feedback loops. Both describe the same universal principle every action triggers a reaction, every cause creates a result, and nothing truly happens in isolation.

This section bridges spiritual philosophy with scientific reasoning, showing that Karma isn’t only mystical it’s measurable in behavior, physics, biology, and psychology.

1. Physics: Newton’s Third Law, The Physical Face of Karma

In physics, Newton’s Third Law states: “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.”
It’s the most direct scientific equivalent of Karma. If you push an object, it pushes back with equal force. Energy doesn’t vanish it transforms, redistributes, and returns.

Parallel to Karma:
Every action, whether physical or moral, sends out energy into the world. The universe maintains balance by returning that energy in some form. When a person spreads kindness, the “reaction” comes as goodwill and cooperation. When they spread harm, resistance and backlash follow. The laws of motion and morality mirror one another both preserve balance in their respective realms.

Real-world example:
Industrial pollution once fueled growth but led to environmental degradation. Now, global warming, rising sea levels, and natural disasters are the “reaction” to humanity’s unchecked “action.” This is Karma on a planetary scale.

2. Psychology: The Law of Cognitive and Behavioral Consequence

In psychology, Behavioral Conditioning and Cognitive Dissonance show how human minds naturally respond to actions with consequences.

• When we act kindly, our brain releases serotonin and oxytocin, creating happiness and emotional stability.
• When we act with deceit or harm, guilt and stress hormones like cortisol rise, leading to anxiety and burnout.

This means moral choices shape not just destiny but brain chemistry.
Dr. Martin Seligman’s research on Positive Psychology confirms that altruistic behavior improves mental health and life satisfaction scientific evidence that “good deeds return good outcomes.”

Example:
People who engage in community service or acts of empathy often report longer lifespans and higher emotional resilience. Conversely, those who engage in manipulation, corruption, or deceit experience higher rates of depression and insomnia due to cognitive dissonance.

3. Biology: The Feedback Mechanism in Nature

Nature itself operates on self-correcting systems. Every ecosystem maintains equilibrium through feedback loops.

• When predator populations rise, prey declines, leading to predator starvation and eventual balance.
• When humans exploit nature, ecological imbalance triggers disease, resource scarcity, and climate change nature’s version of karmic retribution.

Scientific interpretation:
Homeostasis in biology mirrors Karma in philosophy. It’s the built-in correction mechanism of the natural world. Every disturbance, whether physical or moral, finds equilibrium again.

4. Neuroscience: Mirror Neurons and Empathic Return

Neuroscientists discovered mirror neurons, brain cells that react not only when we perform an action but when we see others doing it. This means our brain literally mirrors emotional energy pain, joy, compassion around us.

Example:
When someone acts cruelly, they unconsciously absorb negative emotional states from their environment. The human brain is wired for empathy, so harming others often rebounds psychologically. This supports the idea that negative energy returns not through mystical force but through neural feedback.

5. Sociology: The Law of Social Reciprocity

Sociologists recognize reciprocity as a universal social rule. Communities that thrive operate on trust, fairness, and shared benefit. When individuals or institutions act selfishly, social trust collapses and isolation begins.

Example:
Corporate leaders who exploit workers or customers often face reputation collapse and consumer backlash. The downfall of major companies like Enron or the 2008 financial crash were not random, they were systemic reactions to greed and unethical behavior. Karma in this case worked through social systems.

6. Quantum Physics: The Observer Effect and Energy Exchange

In quantum science, the Observer Effect suggests that observation itself alters the state of what’s observed. Conscious intent influences energy behavior. While not “Karma” in the traditional sense, it aligns with the idea that thought and intention shape reality.

Modern insight:
Dr. Masaru Emoto’s experiments on water crystals showed that positive words and thoughts formed harmonious patterns, while negative ones caused chaotic structures. Though controversial, the idea symbolizes how consciousness affects the material world.

It echoes ancient wisdom: “As you think, so you become.”

7. Real-world Reflections of Scientific Karma

• Environmental Karma: The rise in climate disasters reflects humanity’s exploitation of resources.
• Technological Karma: The internet brought knowledge but also misinformation and addiction every innovation has its shadow.
• Health Karma: Poor lifestyle choices smoking, stress, unhealthy diet return as physical disease. The body, like the universe, keeps score.

8. The Unified Principle: Science and Spirituality Converge

Whether in physics, biology, or ethics, the same truth emerges: actions generate reactions. Energy never disappears it circulates. Every system in nature, including the human mind, seeks balance.

What ancient sages called Karma, science calls causality. Both describe a universal principle the inevitability of consequence.

The Scientific Soul of Karma

Karma isn’t mythology it’s the architecture of reality. From subatomic particles to human society, everything runs on the law of return.

When we act with integrity, empathy, and awareness, we align with the natural flow of this universal law. When we act with greed, hatred, or harm, we disrupt it and that disruption circles back, as pain or loss, to restore equilibrium.

The lesson is timeless and scientific:
Nothing vanishes without trace. Everything comes full circle.

Or in both the language of science and spirit:

Every action leaves a footprint, and the universe always follows the trail.

Read part 1 before continuing part 2

Antineoplastons are a group of naturally occurring peptides and amino acid derivatives that have been proposed as a treatment for cancer. The theory behind antineoplaston therapy is that these compounds can selectively target and kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed. 

Antineoplaston therapy was first developed by Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski in the 1970s. Dr. Burzynski discovered the compounds while studying peptides in blood and urine, and he began using them to treat cancer patients in the 1980s. Over the years, Dr. Burzynski and his team have conducted multiple clinical trials to test the safety and efficacy of antineoplaston therapy. 

The results of these trials have been mixed. Some patients have reported significant improvements in their cancer symptoms, while others have not seen any benefit. Additionally, some studies have suggested that antineoplaston therapy may have toxic side effects. The American Cancer Society (ACS) states that the safety and effectiveness of antineoplaston therapy have not been proven. The FDA has approved a limited number of clinical trials for antineoplastons for specific types of brain tumors, but larger and well-designed studies are still needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of antineoplaston therapy. 

It’s worth noting that Antineoplaston therapy is not widely accepted in the medical community, and the scientific evidence supporting its use as a cancer treatment is limited. The FDA has not approved antineoplaston therapy as a treatment for cancer, and it is not widely available in the United States. 

Antineoplaston therapy is an alternative cancer treatment that has been proposed as a treatment for cancer, but its safety and effectiveness have not been proven. There are still many questions about the long-term safety and efficacy of antineoplaston therapy, and more research is needed to determine whether it is a viable treatment option for cancer patients. Patients should consult with their healthcare providers before considering antineoplaston therapy as a cancer treatment. It’s important to remember that while alternative therapies may have some positive effects, they may not be as effective as standard cancer treatments and may have negative side effects. 

Antineoplastons are a group of natural compounds that have been proposed as a treatment for cancer. The compounds were discovered by Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, a Polish-American physician, who began studying them in the 1970s. Dr. Burzynski claims that antineoplastons can selectively target and kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells intact. 

Antineoplastons are made from substances that are found naturally in the body, such as amino acids and peptides. They are administered orally or intravenously. According to Dr. Burzynski, antineoplastons work by restoring the balance of genetic regulation in cancer cells, which leads to cancer cell death. 

There have been several clinical trials of antineoplastons in patients with different types of cancer, including brain tumors, lung cancer, and breast cancer. Some of these trials have reported positive results, with patients showing improvement in their symptoms and tumor size reduction. However, many of the trials have been small and have not been conducted using rigorous scientific methods. 

The scientific community has been divided in their opinion on the effectiveness of antineoplastons as a cancer treatment. Some researchers have criticized the lack of rigorous scientific evidence supporting the use of antineoplastons, while others have pointed out the promising results seen in some of the trials. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved antineoplastons as a cancer treatment. The FDA has instead approved a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of antineoplastons in treating certain types of brain tumors. 

It’s worth mentioning that antineoplastons as a cancer treatment is considered as alternative or experimental therapy, and its use should be discussed with a doctor before making any decision. Also, it’s important to note that the FDA has not approved antineoplastons as a cancer treatment, and their safety and effectiveness have not been established. 

Antineoplastons are a group of natural compounds that have been proposed as a treatment for cancer. While there have been some reports of positive results in the treatment of cancer with antineoplastons, more rigorous scientific evidence is needed to establish their safety and effectiveness. It’s important to talk to a doctor before considering antineoplastons as a cancer treatment and to be aware that it is not approved by the FDA. 

Here is the link for part 2